<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 545 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787790</link>
    <description>Reassessment under Section 153A requires incriminating material relied upon to be traceable to the assessee&#039;s own search and seizure. Material seized during searches of third-party premises cannot, on these facts, support alleged unaccounted receipts in a Section 153A assessment where no departmental evidence links seized material from the assessee&#039;s premises to the additions. Approval under Section 153D must also demonstrate the approving authority&#039;s independent application of mind; mechanical concurrence with the Assessing Officer&#039;s proposal is insufficient. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was allowed because the assessment relied on third-party material and lacked valid approval.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 545 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787790</link>
      <description>Reassessment under Section 153A requires incriminating material relied upon to be traceable to the assessee&#039;s own search and seizure. Material seized during searches of third-party premises cannot, on these facts, support alleged unaccounted receipts in a Section 153A assessment where no departmental evidence links seized material from the assessee&#039;s premises to the additions. Approval under Section 153D must also demonstrate the approving authority&#039;s independent application of mind; mechanical concurrence with the Assessing Officer&#039;s proposal is insufficient. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was allowed because the assessment relied on third-party material and lacked valid approval.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>