<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 551 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787796</link>
    <description>Seized-document corroboration required: entries in a seized diary cannot be enhanced by hypothesising addition of zeros or treated as unexplained advances without independent corroboration; affidavits, recorded statements and cash flows plausibly rebut the presumption attaching to seized material, so diary-based additions and consequential interest were deleted. Similarly, undated unsigned loose project sheets not in assessee&#039;s handwriting and lacking agreements, payments or fund-flow linkage are dumb documents and cannot sustain unexplained investment additions; those additions were deleted. The operative rule is that suspicion or hypothetical alteration of seized entries cannot replace cogent independent evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 551 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787796</link>
      <description>Seized-document corroboration required: entries in a seized diary cannot be enhanced by hypothesising addition of zeros or treated as unexplained advances without independent corroboration; affidavits, recorded statements and cash flows plausibly rebut the presumption attaching to seized material, so diary-based additions and consequential interest were deleted. Similarly, undated unsigned loose project sheets not in assessee&#039;s handwriting and lacking agreements, payments or fund-flow linkage are dumb documents and cannot sustain unexplained investment additions; those additions were deleted. The operative rule is that suspicion or hypothetical alteration of seized entries cannot replace cogent independent evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>