<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 563 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787808</link>
    <description>An appeal under the Income tax Act is maintainable only on substantial questions of law; concurrent findings of fact supported by evidence and free from perversity cannot be reappreciated on such appeal. The Tribunal properly confirmed additions after noting notices to customers, ledger entries dominated by cash, unconvincing DD explanations, customers&#039; denials and non traceability, and the appellant&#039;s failure to produce creditworthy documents or witnesses. Reliance on customers&#039; replies did not breach procedure where no request for cross examination appears and the appellant had opportunity to summon witnesses; therefore no substantial question of law arises to entertain the appellate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:33:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 563 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787808</link>
      <description>An appeal under the Income tax Act is maintainable only on substantial questions of law; concurrent findings of fact supported by evidence and free from perversity cannot be reappreciated on such appeal. The Tribunal properly confirmed additions after noting notices to customers, ledger entries dominated by cash, unconvincing DD explanations, customers&#039; denials and non traceability, and the appellant&#039;s failure to produce creditworthy documents or witnesses. Reliance on customers&#039; replies did not breach procedure where no request for cross examination appears and the appellant had opportunity to summon witnesses; therefore no substantial question of law arises to entertain the appellate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>