https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787825 Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under offences under the CGST statute was decided on parity with a co-accused: the Court applied the parity principle in bail by treating identical procedural position and comparable role as sufficient to justify identical bail terms, noted the State's concession of parity, the absence of other criminal antecedents, prolonged pre-trial custody and likely trial duration; the Court did not evaluate merits of allegations and ordered release on regular bail on the same terms as the co-accused subject to furnishing bail/surety bonds within seven days, failing which custody beyond that week will not be condoned. en-us Sat, 07 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:33:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787825 Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under offences under the CGST statute was decided on parity with a co-accused: the Court applied the parity principle in bail by treating identical procedural position and comparable role as sufficient to justify identical bail terms, noted the State's concession of parity, the absence of other criminal antecedents, prolonged pre-trial custody and likely trial duration; the Court did not evaluate merits of allegations and ordered release on regular bail on the same terms as the co-accused subject to furnishing bail/surety bonds within seven days, failing which custody beyond that week will not be condoned. Case-Laws GST Sat, 07 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787825