<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 2105 - ITAT JALANDHAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467239</link>
    <description>For cooperative banks, provision for bad and doubtful debts under section 36(1)(viia) was treated as allowable for the banking business as a whole and not limited to rural advances, so the higher provision claimed was accepted and the disallowance was deleted. Interest on non-performing assets was held taxable on receipt basis, because real income had not accrued and RBI income-recognition norms for cooperative banks prevailed over accrual-based taxation under section 145; the estimated interest addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 19:07:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 2105 - ITAT JALANDHAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467239</link>
      <description>For cooperative banks, provision for bad and doubtful debts under section 36(1)(viia) was treated as allowable for the banking business as a whole and not limited to rural advances, so the higher provision claimed was accepted and the disallowance was deleted. Interest on non-performing assets was held taxable on receipt basis, because real income had not accrued and RBI income-recognition norms for cooperative banks prevailed over accrual-based taxation under section 145; the estimated interest addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>