https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467250 Writ challenge to tax demand orders was held non-maintainable because an efficacious statutory appellate remedy exists; the availability of the appellate forum under the statute was decisive on maintainability. The court treated a procedural irregularity in issuance of a consolidated notice as not negating the appellate remedy. The petitioner was granted liberty to file the statutory appeal and to claim tolling under the Limitation Act; respondents were restrained from taking precipitative action for thirty days and the appellate authority was directed to decide the appeal uninfluenced by this order. en-us Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Mar 2026 19:07:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467250 Writ challenge to tax demand orders was held non-maintainable because an efficacious statutory appellate remedy exists; the availability of the appellate forum under the statute was decisive on maintainability. The court treated a procedural irregularity in issuance of a consolidated notice as not negating the appellate remedy. The petitioner was granted liberty to file the statutory appeal and to claim tolling under the Limitation Act; respondents were restrained from taking precipitative action for thirty days and the appellate authority was directed to decide the appeal uninfluenced by this order. Case-Laws GST Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467250