<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 122 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50517</link>
    <description>Melting aluminium ingots into round ingots or billets for extrusion did not amount to manufacture because the process only changed the physical form of unwrought aluminium without altering its essential chemical composition or creating a new commercially distinct commodity. Ingots and billets were treated as different forms of the same unwrought aluminium, so no dutiable new product arose and no duty liability attached.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:48:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 122 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50517</link>
      <description>Melting aluminium ingots into round ingots or billets for extrusion did not amount to manufacture because the process only changed the physical form of unwrought aluminium without altering its essential chemical composition or creating a new commercially distinct commodity. Ingots and billets were treated as different forms of the same unwrought aluminium, so no dutiable new product arose and no duty liability attached.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>