<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 498 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787743</link>
    <description>A Special Leave Petition raising a substantial question of law on the precedential effect of an earlier High Court judgment affirmed by the Supreme Court was rejected because the filing delay of 730 days was not condoned. The Court found that the explanation offered did not amount to sufficient cause and dismissed the petition solely on the ground of inordinate delay, without examining the merits of the legal issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:18:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 498 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787743</link>
      <description>A Special Leave Petition raising a substantial question of law on the precedential effect of an earlier High Court judgment affirmed by the Supreme Court was rejected because the filing delay of 730 days was not condoned. The Court found that the explanation offered did not amount to sufficient cause and dismissed the petition solely on the ground of inordinate delay, without examining the merits of the legal issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>