https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787671 Clause 19.13 was analysed as a valid arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the doctrine of separability meant its operation was not automatically lost on termination of the underlying contract or approval of a resolution plan. The Section 11(6-A) inquiry was treated as confined to a prima facie check of whether an arbitration agreement exists, leaving insolvency-based objections, including the Clean Slate doctrine, to the arbitral tribunal under Section 16. The note also distinguishes claims against a corporate debtor from the debtor's own independent civil remedies, treating the disputes as prima facie arbitrable despite objections based on extinguishment, waiver, estoppel, or accord and satisfaction. en-us Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:17:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787671 Clause 19.13 was analysed as a valid arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the doctrine of separability meant its operation was not automatically lost on termination of the underlying contract or approval of a resolution plan. The Section 11(6-A) inquiry was treated as confined to a prima facie check of whether an arbitration agreement exists, leaving insolvency-based objections, including the Clean Slate doctrine, to the arbitral tribunal under Section 16. The note also distinguishes claims against a corporate debtor from the debtor's own independent civil remedies, treating the disputes as prima facie arbitrable despite objections based on extinguishment, waiver, estoppel, or accord and satisfaction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787671