<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 145 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50504</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the duty demand and penalty imposed on the manufacturers of betel nut powder under tariff item 2106.90. The judgment highlighted that betel nut powder was not classified under the relevant tariff during the disputed period, leading to the dismissal of the duty demand. The Tribunal directed the Revenue to refund the deposit made by the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:20:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 145 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50504</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the duty demand and penalty imposed on the manufacturers of betel nut powder under tariff item 2106.90. The judgment highlighted that betel nut powder was not classified under the relevant tariff during the disputed period, leading to the dismissal of the duty demand. The Tribunal directed the Revenue to refund the deposit made by the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>