<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Right to be Heard overrules technical non compliance; matter remanded for verification of loan and interest documentation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97570</link>
    <description>Non technical procedural non compliance in a faceless assessment regime was held insufficient to sustain an ex parte dismissal where the assessee offered a plausible explanation of limited literacy and unfamiliarity with electronic notices; the Tribunal treated substantive right to be heard and substantial justice as prevailing over mere technical default and found the appellate order procedurally defective for not permitting final production of loan sanction letters, bank certificates and interest certificates. The appellate order was set aside and the matter remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication with directed verification of the loan and interest documents and a reasonable opportunity to produce evidence, subject to a warning that further non cooperation may attract adverse inference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:17:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:17:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Right to be Heard overrules technical non compliance; matter remanded for verification of loan and interest documentation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97570</link>
      <description>Non technical procedural non compliance in a faceless assessment regime was held insufficient to sustain an ex parte dismissal where the assessee offered a plausible explanation of limited literacy and unfamiliarity with electronic notices; the Tribunal treated substantive right to be heard and substantial justice as prevailing over mere technical default and found the appellate order procedurally defective for not permitting final production of loan sanction letters, bank certificates and interest certificates. The appellate order was set aside and the matter remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication with directed verification of the loan and interest documents and a reasonable opportunity to produce evidence, subject to a warning that further non cooperation may attract adverse inference.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:17:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>