<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1454 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467199</link>
    <description>A criminal FIR alleging criminal breach of trust, cheating and conspiracy arising from a land transaction was quashed after the parties entered into a voluntary compromise. The complainants confirmed that the commercial dispute had been settled without coercion, had received part payment under the settlement, and no longer wished to pursue the criminal case. In these circumstances, continuation of the FIR and connected proceedings was found to serve no useful purpose because the grievance had been resolved and the dispute was essentially commercial in nature. The proceedings were therefore quashed qua the petitioners, subject to deposit of costs with the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 23:34:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1454 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467199</link>
      <description>A criminal FIR alleging criminal breach of trust, cheating and conspiracy arising from a land transaction was quashed after the parties entered into a voluntary compromise. The complainants confirmed that the commercial dispute had been settled without coercion, had received part payment under the settlement, and no longer wished to pursue the criminal case. In these circumstances, continuation of the FIR and connected proceedings was found to serve no useful purpose because the grievance had been resolved and the dispute was essentially commercial in nature. The proceedings were therefore quashed qua the petitioners, subject to deposit of costs with the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>