<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1385 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467200</link>
    <description>The right to travel abroad is part of personal liberty under Article 21 and cannot be curtailed by executive instructions alone; any restraint must rest on a valid law and a fair, reasonable procedure. The Passports Act, 1967 does not exhaust every form of travel-related restriction, so office memoranda are not invalid merely because the Act exists. However, extending LOC-requesting authority to chairmen, managing directors and chief executive officers of public sector banks is said to create an irrational, unguided classification and to expose borrowers to coercive restraint without adequate safeguards. LOCs issued at the instance of public sector banks are also described as lacking notice, hearing, reasons and proportionality, and are therefore treated as invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 12:05:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1385 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467200</link>
      <description>The right to travel abroad is part of personal liberty under Article 21 and cannot be curtailed by executive instructions alone; any restraint must rest on a valid law and a fair, reasonable procedure. The Passports Act, 1967 does not exhaust every form of travel-related restriction, so office memoranda are not invalid merely because the Act exists. However, extending LOC-requesting authority to chairmen, managing directors and chief executive officers of public sector banks is said to create an irrational, unguided classification and to expose borrowers to coercive restraint without adequate safeguards. LOCs issued at the instance of public sector banks are also described as lacking notice, hearing, reasons and proportionality, and are therefore treated as invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>