<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rates of depreciation on &#039;actual cost&#039; on SLM basis and on &#039;intangible assets&#039; seems, without authority of CBDT, to prescribe such rates.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15997</link>
    <description>Section 295 gives the Board rule-making power to prescribe depreciation percentages, but the specific clause is framed around written down value and depreciable buildings, machinery, plant and furniture. The article argues that depreciation on intangible assets and on actual cost under the straight line method may fall outside that specific power. It also notes that retrospective rule-making is permitted, subject to statutory limits, and suggests a retrospective amendment to section 295 to align the rules and reduce disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 09:25:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 09:25:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Rates of depreciation on &#039;actual cost&#039; on SLM basis and on &#039;intangible assets&#039; seems, without authority of CBDT, to prescribe such rates.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15997</link>
      <description>Section 295 gives the Board rule-making power to prescribe depreciation percentages, but the specific clause is framed around written down value and depreciable buildings, machinery, plant and furniture. The article argues that depreciation on intangible assets and on actual cost under the straight line method may fall outside that specific power. It also notes that retrospective rule-making is permitted, subject to statutory limits, and suggests a retrospective amendment to section 295 to align the rules and reduce disputes.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 09:25:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>