<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 425 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787670</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned in relation to the proposed appeal, and the Court preserved the petitioner&#039;s ability to seek substantive review by directing that an appeal filed within a fortnight must be entertained and decided on merits despite the earlier limitation bar. The Court did not disturb the High Court&#039;s approach granting liberty to pursue the appellate remedy, but modified the time allowed for filing. The special leave petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:52:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 425 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787670</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned in relation to the proposed appeal, and the Court preserved the petitioner&#039;s ability to seek substantive review by directing that an appeal filed within a fortnight must be entertained and decided on merits despite the earlier limitation bar. The Court did not disturb the High Court&#039;s approach granting liberty to pursue the appellate remedy, but modified the time allowed for filing. The special leave petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>