https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467172 Conflicting Supreme Court authorities on addition of income for future prospects in motor accident compensation created uncertainty, particularly on whether self-employed persons and fixed-wage earners are entitled to such addition. The Court noted divergent approaches in the line of decisions from Sarla Verma, Santosh Devi, Rajesh and Reshma Kumari, and held that authoritative uniformity was lacking. The controversy was therefore referred to a larger Bench for settlement of the law, and the matter was placed before the Chief Justice of India for constitution of an appropriate Bench. en-us Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:51:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467172 Conflicting Supreme Court authorities on addition of income for future prospects in motor accident compensation created uncertainty, particularly on whether self-employed persons and fixed-wage earners are entitled to such addition. The Court noted divergent approaches in the line of decisions from Sarla Verma, Santosh Devi, Rajesh and Reshma Kumari, and held that authoritative uniformity was lacking. The controversy was therefore referred to a larger Bench for settlement of the law, and the matter was placed before the Chief Justice of India for constitution of an appropriate Bench. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467172