<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1620 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467174</link>
    <description>A reasonable-belief standard at the provisional attachment and confirmation stage under PMLA suffices where material (ECIR, FIRs, chargesheets, statements and documentary bank/police records) has a rational nexus to alleged laundering; full proof for confiscation remains for the Special Court. Properties (including those acquired before December 2015) may be treated as proceeds of crime if linkable to laundering of scheduled-offence proceeds; unexplained deposits, loan repayments and income-asset discrepancy together with statements can establish that nexus. Valuations by a competent government agency are admissible and challenges based solely on tax declarations do not negate disproportionate acquisition. Appeals against confirmation were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:51:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1620 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467174</link>
      <description>A reasonable-belief standard at the provisional attachment and confirmation stage under PMLA suffices where material (ECIR, FIRs, chargesheets, statements and documentary bank/police records) has a rational nexus to alleged laundering; full proof for confiscation remains for the Special Court. Properties (including those acquired before December 2015) may be treated as proceeds of crime if linkable to laundering of scheduled-offence proceeds; unexplained deposits, loan repayments and income-asset discrepancy together with statements can establish that nexus. Valuations by a competent government agency are admissible and challenges based solely on tax declarations do not negate disproportionate acquisition. Appeals against confirmation were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>