<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1801 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467179</link>
    <description>Challenge concerned refusal of an adjournment to permit filing a Deed of Assignment of Business Debt and whether that denial impaired the appellant&#039;s ability to establish the claim quantum under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal reiterated that when a party&#039;s material right may be affected by temporary inability to place a foundational document on record, the adjudicating forum should allow its placement for lawful appreciation. The impugned rejection for being below the monetary threshold was quashed insofar as the Deed was not considered, and the matter was remitted to the NCLT for fresh adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:51:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1801 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467179</link>
      <description>Challenge concerned refusal of an adjournment to permit filing a Deed of Assignment of Business Debt and whether that denial impaired the appellant&#039;s ability to establish the claim quantum under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal reiterated that when a party&#039;s material right may be affected by temporary inability to place a foundational document on record, the adjudicating forum should allow its placement for lawful appreciation. The impugned rejection for being below the monetary threshold was quashed insofar as the Deed was not considered, and the matter was remitted to the NCLT for fresh adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>