<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1618 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467181</link>
    <description>Whether a belated Expression of Interest (EoI) must be accepted was resolved by prioritising the Committee of Creditors&#039; commercial wisdom and the limited authority of the Resolution Professional; the tribunal found the Adjudicating Authority did not err in refusing to direct acceptance of a single late EoI where the CoC had, in its commercial judgment, declined belated submissions to preserve fairness and had resolved to pursue liquidation. The regulatory framework permits refusal of belated EoIs once the CoC has taken a clear commercial decision, and the appeal was dismissed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:51:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1618 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467181</link>
      <description>Whether a belated Expression of Interest (EoI) must be accepted was resolved by prioritising the Committee of Creditors&#039; commercial wisdom and the limited authority of the Resolution Professional; the tribunal found the Adjudicating Authority did not err in refusing to direct acceptance of a single late EoI where the CoC had, in its commercial judgment, declined belated submissions to preserve fairness and had resolved to pursue liquidation. The regulatory framework permits refusal of belated EoIs once the CoC has taken a clear commercial decision, and the appeal was dismissed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>