<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 351 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787596</link>
    <description>Remuneration paid to a professional player by a league franchisee for match participation and promotional activities does not qualify as a &#039;business support service&#039; under Section 65(104c) of the Finance Act, 1994; the Tribunal applied statutory interpretation and precedent to conclude fees for playing are services of a professional performer, not independent contractor business-support services, and therefore outside the taxable ambit. The decision also holds that a departmental instruction (CBEC circular of 26 July, 2010) cannot lawfully expand the statutory charging provision to impose service tax on composite fees; appeal allowed for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:51:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 351 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787596</link>
      <description>Remuneration paid to a professional player by a league franchisee for match participation and promotional activities does not qualify as a &#039;business support service&#039; under Section 65(104c) of the Finance Act, 1994; the Tribunal applied statutory interpretation and precedent to conclude fees for playing are services of a professional performer, not independent contractor business-support services, and therefore outside the taxable ambit. The decision also holds that a departmental instruction (CBEC circular of 26 July, 2010) cannot lawfully expand the statutory charging provision to impose service tax on composite fees; appeal allowed for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>