<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 188 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50478</link>
    <description>Rule 57G on Modvat credit is analysed on the basis that credit under the prescribed document becomes relevant only when imported inputs are actually cleared from the custodian and received in the factory. The six-month limitation under Rule 57G(5) is construed harmoniously with Rule 57G(3), so the operative date for computing time is the date of clearance of the goods, not the date of payment of duty on the Bill of Entry. On that reasoning, the credit was treated as admissible and the denial of credit as unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:15:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 188 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50478</link>
      <description>Rule 57G on Modvat credit is analysed on the basis that credit under the prescribed document becomes relevant only when imported inputs are actually cleared from the custodian and received in the factory. The six-month limitation under Rule 57G(5) is construed harmoniously with Rule 57G(3), so the operative date for computing time is the date of clearance of the goods, not the date of payment of duty on the Bill of Entry. On that reasoning, the credit was treated as admissible and the denial of credit as unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>