https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787645 Whether Sections 69 and 132 of the Haryana GST Act are ultravires was considered against a binding Supreme Court precedent which foreclosed the constitutional competence and reasonableness challenge; the Court applied precedent as controlling authority and dismissed the vires plea. The petitioner acknowledged coverage by that precedent and sought liberty to pursue other remedies; the Court granted leave to pursue remaining prayers while declining to quash the impugned provisions under the settled precedent. en-us Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:51:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787645 Whether Sections 69 and 132 of the Haryana GST Act are ultravires was considered against a binding Supreme Court precedent which foreclosed the constitutional competence and reasonableness challenge; the Court applied precedent as controlling authority and dismissed the vires plea. The petitioner acknowledged coverage by that precedent and sought liberty to pursue other remedies; the Court granted leave to pursue remaining prayers while declining to quash the impugned provisions under the settled precedent. Case-Laws GST Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787645