https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787646 Challenge to the constitutional validity of Sections 69 and 132 of the Haryana GST Act raised arbitrariness and lack of legislative competence; the High Court held the vires issue governed by the Supreme Court precedent in Radhika Agarwal (2025), applying that binding principle to find the constitutional challenge unsustainable and therefore rejected the prayer to quash proceedings under those provisions; the court confined its decision to the vires point and granted liberty to the petitioner to pursue other remedies in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:51:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787646 Challenge to the constitutional validity of Sections 69 and 132 of the Haryana GST Act raised arbitrariness and lack of legislative competence; the High Court held the vires issue governed by the Supreme Court precedent in Radhika Agarwal (2025), applying that binding principle to find the constitutional challenge unsustainable and therefore rejected the prayer to quash proceedings under those provisions; the court confined its decision to the vires point and granted liberty to the petitioner to pursue other remedies in accordance with law. Case-Laws GST Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787646