<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Valuation by transit authorities cannot determine tax liability; non compliance with inspection reporting warrants release and reassessment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97539</link>
    <description>Valuation by check-post authorities under Sections 129/130 cannot determine tax liability; such valuation is reserved to the jurisdictional Assessing Authority, and interception/confiscation proceedings at transit check posts must refer valuation disputes to that authority, resulting here in refusal to uphold valuation-based seizures. Non-compliance with Rule 138C&#039;s contemporaneous online inspection report (Form A) requirement vitiated the detention/confiscation basis and warranted interlocutory release of goods and detained vehicles. Sampling must be redone: samples drawn in triplicate, sealed and countersigned with petitioners or representatives, with one part forwarded to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer who may proceed with assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:51:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:51:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Valuation by transit authorities cannot determine tax liability; non compliance with inspection reporting warrants release and reassessment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97539</link>
      <description>Valuation by check-post authorities under Sections 129/130 cannot determine tax liability; such valuation is reserved to the jurisdictional Assessing Authority, and interception/confiscation proceedings at transit check posts must refer valuation disputes to that authority, resulting here in refusal to uphold valuation-based seizures. Non-compliance with Rule 138C&#039;s contemporaneous online inspection report (Form A) requirement vitiated the detention/confiscation basis and warranted interlocutory release of goods and detained vehicles. Sampling must be redone: samples drawn in triplicate, sealed and countersigned with petitioners or representatives, with one part forwarded to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer who may proceed with assessment.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:51:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>