<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 136 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50476</link>
    <description>Soapy water or waste with less than 5% fatty matter arising in vegetable oil manufacture could not be equated with soap stock, because soap stock under the relevant standard required at least 20% total fatty matter. The record showed that soap stock could emerge only after a further alternate process, and there was no evidence that the entire quantity of soapy water was marketable as such. The valuation based on an invoice for soap stock containing 33.16% fatty matter was therefore inapposite. On that footing, the material was not liable to duty as soap stock, and the proposed demand, penalty and interest were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:12:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 136 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50476</link>
      <description>Soapy water or waste with less than 5% fatty matter arising in vegetable oil manufacture could not be equated with soap stock, because soap stock under the relevant standard required at least 20% total fatty matter. The record showed that soap stock could emerge only after a further alternate process, and there was no evidence that the entire quantity of soapy water was marketable as such. The valuation based on an invoice for soap stock containing 33.16% fatty matter was therefore inapposite. On that footing, the material was not liable to duty as soap stock, and the proposed demand, penalty and interest were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>