<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1604 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467169</link>
    <description>Tribunal reliance on a verified income tax return and bank passbook entries suffices to establish the deceased&#039;s probable income for loss of dependency where testimonial gaps reflect social context rather than contradict documentary proof; challenges to authenticity are neutralised by verification from tax authorities. Tribunals are summary fact-finders for probable income and may award benefit for future prospects of increased income consistent with the Motor Vehicles Act&#039;s social welfare purpose. Where two Full Bench precedents conflict, the later Full Bench decision controls, and the later ruling permitting future prospects was applied to uphold the award in favour of respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1604 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467169</link>
      <description>Tribunal reliance on a verified income tax return and bank passbook entries suffices to establish the deceased&#039;s probable income for loss of dependency where testimonial gaps reflect social context rather than contradict documentary proof; challenges to authenticity are neutralised by verification from tax authorities. Tribunals are summary fact-finders for probable income and may award benefit for future prospects of increased income consistent with the Motor Vehicles Act&#039;s social welfare purpose. Where two Full Bench precedents conflict, the later Full Bench decision controls, and the later ruling permitting future prospects was applied to uphold the award in favour of respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>