https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787548 Court addressed scope of writ jurisdiction over ongoing departmental proceedings, holding that exceptional writ relief is available where prima facie material shows the charged official was not connected to the alleged act at the relevant time and continuation of suspension would cause irreparable prejudice; on that basis the suspension and consequential memorandum were revoked and the official reinstated. The court directed the disciplinary inquiry to be completed expeditiously (preferably by 31 August 2026), preserving the departmental authority to decide merits while protecting the respondent's service rights pending prompt conclusion of the inquiry. en-us Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Mar 2026 07:53:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787548 Court addressed scope of writ jurisdiction over ongoing departmental proceedings, holding that exceptional writ relief is available where prima facie material shows the charged official was not connected to the alleged act at the relevant time and continuation of suspension would cause irreparable prejudice; on that basis the suspension and consequential memorandum were revoked and the official reinstated. The court directed the disciplinary inquiry to be completed expeditiously (preferably by 31 August 2026), preserving the departmental authority to decide merits while protecting the respondent's service rights pending prompt conclusion of the inquiry. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787548