https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787553 Applications seeking condonation of delay in refiling company appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code were examined on the legal principle that refiling delays require a reasonable, satisfactory explanation; allegations of misplaced or illegible records demand detailed, diligent efforts supported by particularized affidavit evidence. The Tribunal applied precedent requiring non-routine condonation and found the supporting affidavits evasive, with unexplained delays after initial e-filing and insufficient documentary steps to cure defects. As a result, the applications for condonation were rejected and the associated company appeals dismissed. en-us Tue, 17 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Mar 2026 07:53:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787553 Applications seeking condonation of delay in refiling company appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code were examined on the legal principle that refiling delays require a reasonable, satisfactory explanation; allegations of misplaced or illegible records demand detailed, diligent efforts supported by particularized affidavit evidence. The Tribunal applied precedent requiring non-routine condonation and found the supporting affidavits evasive, with unexplained delays after initial e-filing and insufficient documentary steps to cure defects. As a result, the applications for condonation were rejected and the associated company appeals dismissed. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 17 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787553