<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 315 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787560</link>
    <description>Cash deposits made during the demonetisation period were explained by the assessee&#039;s cash book, and no defect was found in the cash book or stock register. The Revenue&#039;s relied-upon entries did not show manipulation, as they related to a period before demonetisation and matched earlier and later ledger records. On these facts, the addition under section 68 was held unsustainable and was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 18:34:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 315 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787560</link>
      <description>Cash deposits made during the demonetisation period were explained by the assessee&#039;s cash book, and no defect was found in the cash book or stock register. The Revenue&#039;s relied-upon entries did not show manipulation, as they related to a period before demonetisation and matched earlier and later ledger records. On these facts, the addition under section 68 was held unsustainable and was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>