<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 330 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787575</link>
    <description>Section 263 cannot be invoked where the assessment adopts a legally sustainable view or any proposed correction causes no prejudice to revenue. Interest earned by a cooperative society on investments with cooperative banks qualifies for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d), so allowing that claim does not make the assessment erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. Although income tax debited to profit and loss is ordinarily disallowable, its addition would increase the deduction available under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) without changing taxable income; revision is therefore unwarranted. The appellate delay was condoned, the revisionary order was quashed, and the assessment was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 07:53:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 330 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787575</link>
      <description>Section 263 cannot be invoked where the assessment adopts a legally sustainable view or any proposed correction causes no prejudice to revenue. Interest earned by a cooperative society on investments with cooperative banks qualifies for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d), so allowing that claim does not make the assessment erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. Although income tax debited to profit and loss is ordinarily disallowable, its addition would increase the deduction available under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) without changing taxable income; revision is therefore unwarranted. The appellate delay was condoned, the revisionary order was quashed, and the assessment was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>