https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467168 Validity of a demand notice under the Insolvency Code depended on compliance with Rule 5's prescribed modes and recipient particulars; the tribunal found that service at the registered office by hand/registered/speed post and electronic service to a whole-time director or designated KMP are required, and discrepancies in addresses, incorrect email records and admitted failure to effect registered-post service meant the corporate debtor was denied the mandated opportunity to receive and contest the demand. For those reasons the defective service vitiated the order and the matter was remitted for fresh proceedings after effective service in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 08 Mar 2026 19:32:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467168 Validity of a demand notice under the Insolvency Code depended on compliance with Rule 5's prescribed modes and recipient particulars; the tribunal found that service at the registered office by hand/registered/speed post and electronic service to a whole-time director or designated KMP are required, and discrepancies in addresses, incorrect email records and admitted failure to effect registered-post service meant the corporate debtor was denied the mandated opportunity to receive and contest the demand. For those reasons the defective service vitiated the order and the matter was remitted for fresh proceedings after effective service in accordance with law. Case-Laws IBC Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467168