<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1753 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467147</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail in a prosecution under the NDPS Act was refused where the available record showed prima facie involvement of the applicant, including that the applicant was the registered owner of the vehicle from which the contraband was allegedly recovered. On that material, the court found no basis to grant protection against arrest at that stage, and the application was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 22:06:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1753 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467147</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail in a prosecution under the NDPS Act was refused where the available record showed prima facie involvement of the applicant, including that the applicant was the registered owner of the vehicle from which the contraband was allegedly recovered. On that material, the court found no basis to grant protection against arrest at that stage, and the application was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>