<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1956 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467148</link>
    <description>Crushing and screening of run-of-mine iron ore, without beneficiation, special metallurgical treatment, or removal of foreign matter, does not amount to manufacture of iron ore concentrate under Chapter Note 4 to Chapter 26 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The burden was on the Department to establish that the process resulted in concentration or enhancement of ferrous content, but the record showed only size reduction and segregation into lumps and fines. Technical material and official clarifications on beneficiation supported the view that concentrate requires further processes such as milling, washing, magnetic separation, flotation, or similar treatment. On that basis, the duty demand, interest, and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 22:06:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1956 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467148</link>
      <description>Crushing and screening of run-of-mine iron ore, without beneficiation, special metallurgical treatment, or removal of foreign matter, does not amount to manufacture of iron ore concentrate under Chapter Note 4 to Chapter 26 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The burden was on the Department to establish that the process resulted in concentration or enhancement of ferrous content, but the record showed only size reduction and segregation into lumps and fines. Technical material and official clarifications on beneficiation supported the view that concentrate requires further processes such as milling, washing, magnetic separation, flotation, or similar treatment. On that basis, the duty demand, interest, and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>