<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1956 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467148</link>
    <description>Whether crushing and screening of iron ore constitutes manufacture of iron ore concentrates was determined by CESTAT: the tribunal applied the tariff/HSN framework and administrative clarifications to conclude that mere crushing and sizing, without beneficiation processes that remove gangue or enrich ferrous content, does not amount to special treatment producing concentrates. Circulars and an Office Memorandum treat lumps and fines from crushing alone as naturally occurring ore. The revenue failed to prove beneficiation or conversion to concentrates and prior tribunal precedents were applied; consequently excise duty, interest and penalty demand was set aside and the appeal allowed for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 22:06:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1956 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467148</link>
      <description>Whether crushing and screening of iron ore constitutes manufacture of iron ore concentrates was determined by CESTAT: the tribunal applied the tariff/HSN framework and administrative clarifications to conclude that mere crushing and sizing, without beneficiation processes that remove gangue or enrich ferrous content, does not amount to special treatment producing concentrates. Circulars and an Office Memorandum treat lumps and fines from crushing alone as naturally occurring ore. The revenue failed to prove beneficiation or conversion to concentrates and prior tribunal precedents were applied; consequently excise duty, interest and penalty demand was set aside and the appeal allowed for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>