<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 157 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals challenging orders-in-original that permitted two manufacturers to benefit from Notification No. 8/97 for concessional duty rates on finished goods. The dispute centered on whether certain imported materials used in manufacturing qualified as raw materials under the notification. The Tribunal held that the imported materials were essential for the quality of the finished products and not consumables as argued by the Revenue. The Tribunal set aside the orders-in-original, remitted the matter for further consideration on duty payable, and granted the manufacturers a fair hearing opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:08:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 157 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals challenging orders-in-original that permitted two manufacturers to benefit from Notification No. 8/97 for concessional duty rates on finished goods. The dispute centered on whether certain imported materials used in manufacturing qualified as raw materials under the notification. The Tribunal held that the imported materials were essential for the quality of the finished products and not consumables as argued by the Revenue. The Tribunal set aside the orders-in-original, remitted the matter for further consideration on duty payable, and granted the manufacturers a fair hearing opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>