<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1373 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467165</link>
    <description>Immunity from penalty under section 270AA must be granted where the taxpayer pays tax and interest, does not appeal the assessment order, and files a timely immunity application, unless a valid rejection follows the prescribed procedure. The Assessing Officer must decide the application within the statutory period and cannot reject it without an opportunity of hearing. Penalty for misreporting under section 270A also requires identification of the applicable statutory limb. Amounts of a proprietorship charged to a company were treated as underreporting rather than misreporting. Failure to decide the immunity application and to establish misreporting rendered the penalty unsustainable and resulted in its cancellation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 18:09:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1373 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467165</link>
      <description>Immunity from penalty under section 270AA must be granted where the taxpayer pays tax and interest, does not appeal the assessment order, and files a timely immunity application, unless a valid rejection follows the prescribed procedure. The Assessing Officer must decide the application within the statutory period and cannot reject it without an opportunity of hearing. Penalty for misreporting under section 270A also requires identification of the applicable statutory limb. Amounts of a proprietorship charged to a company were treated as underreporting rather than misreporting. Failure to decide the immunity application and to establish misreporting rendered the penalty unsustainable and resulted in its cancellation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>