<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ANTI PROFITEERING - COMPLAINANT NOT TURNING UP-BUILDER</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120804</link>
    <description>Anti-profiteering enquiry concerns a builder who charged sale prices inclusive of GST despite agreements stating prices exclusive of GST, and who has produced agreements, sale deeds and tax invoices to show a price reduction. The key issue is whether documentary evidence and books can be correlated with a computation demonstrating the benefit was passed through to customers, while allegations about lack of written consent remain an evidentiary contention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 13:55:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 04:50:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ANTI PROFITEERING - COMPLAINANT NOT TURNING UP-BUILDER</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120804</link>
      <description>Anti-profiteering enquiry concerns a builder who charged sale prices inclusive of GST despite agreements stating prices exclusive of GST, and who has produced agreements, sale deeds and tax invoices to show a price reduction. The key issue is whether documentary evidence and books can be correlated with a computation demonstrating the benefit was passed through to customers, while allegations about lack of written consent remain an evidentiary contention.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 13:55:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>