<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 251 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787496</link>
    <description>The note addresses whether service tax applies to Protection &amp; Indemnity (P&amp;I) fees paid to Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Ltd, focusing on mutuality and the scope of Explanation 3 to Section 65B(44). It records that Explanation 3 was not pleaded in the show-cause notice and the Revenue failed to prove the P&amp;I club was an unincorporated association or a taxable &quot;body of persons.&quot; Documentary evidence showed the club&#039;s statutory incorporation and characterization of payments as mutual premiums. Applying the Calcutta Club construction, the piece concludes that services within genuine mutuality by an incorporated club fall outside service-tax liability, so the demand cannot be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 251 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787496</link>
      <description>The note addresses whether service tax applies to Protection &amp; Indemnity (P&amp;I) fees paid to Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Ltd, focusing on mutuality and the scope of Explanation 3 to Section 65B(44). It records that Explanation 3 was not pleaded in the show-cause notice and the Revenue failed to prove the P&amp;I club was an unincorporated association or a taxable &quot;body of persons.&quot; Documentary evidence showed the club&#039;s statutory incorporation and characterization of payments as mutual premiums. Applying the Calcutta Club construction, the piece concludes that services within genuine mutuality by an incorporated club fall outside service-tax liability, so the demand cannot be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>