<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 256 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787501</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed whether a creditor with an admitted claim in CIRP may update or withdraw that claim under Regulation 12A when it is partly or fully satisfied, and whether the IRP/RP may refuse such withdrawal or must seek the Adjudicating Authority. It held that Regulation 12A requires creditors to update claims on partial or full satisfaction and that the IRP/RP has administrative duties to receive, verify and maintain updated claims but lacks adjudicatory power to finally determine withdrawal. Consequently, final determination of withdrawal requires the Adjudicating Authority; the IRP was justified in seeking directions and the matter is remanded for fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 256 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787501</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed whether a creditor with an admitted claim in CIRP may update or withdraw that claim under Regulation 12A when it is partly or fully satisfied, and whether the IRP/RP may refuse such withdrawal or must seek the Adjudicating Authority. It held that Regulation 12A requires creditors to update claims on partial or full satisfaction and that the IRP/RP has administrative duties to receive, verify and maintain updated claims but lacks adjudicatory power to finally determine withdrawal. Consequently, final determination of withdrawal requires the Adjudicating Authority; the IRP was justified in seeking directions and the matter is remanded for fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>