https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787502 Addresses whether adjudicating authorities may extend the Personal Insolvency Resolution Process (PIRP) timeline beyond the moratorium outer limit under Section 101 of the IBC; concludes that the 180 day moratorium outer limit remains fixed for moratorium protection but does not automatically terminate the PIRP or bar the authority from permitting limited extensions of the resolution process where timelines are procedural or directory and substantive justice or stakeholders' interests require; consequence: applications for procedural extension of PIRP were allowed to permit completion and submission of the repayment plan report within the specified extended period. en-us Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787502 Addresses whether adjudicating authorities may extend the Personal Insolvency Resolution Process (PIRP) timeline beyond the moratorium outer limit under Section 101 of the IBC; concludes that the 180 day moratorium outer limit remains fixed for moratorium protection but does not automatically terminate the PIRP or bar the authority from permitting limited extensions of the resolution process where timelines are procedural or directory and substantive justice or stakeholders' interests require; consequence: applications for procedural extension of PIRP were allowed to permit completion and submission of the repayment plan report within the specified extended period. Case-Laws IBC Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787502