https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787504 Challenge to stay an ongoing criminal investigation and recall of non-bailable warrants was considered against the threshold for interference with investigations; the court applied Neeharika and Siddharth Mukesh Bhandari principles that interference is permissible only in rare cases where no cognizable offence is disclosed or non-interference causes miscarriage of justice, and examined BNSS provisions and availability of anticipatory bail. Finding material differences between earlier and impugned FIRs, evidence of NCLT findings and observer reports, and petitioner's non-cooperation, the court found prima facie cognizable offences and dismissed the applications. en-us Sat, 28 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787504 Challenge to stay an ongoing criminal investigation and recall of non-bailable warrants was considered against the threshold for interference with investigations; the court applied Neeharika and Siddharth Mukesh Bhandari principles that interference is permissible only in rare cases where no cognizable offence is disclosed or non-interference causes miscarriage of justice, and examined BNSS provisions and availability of anticipatory bail. Finding material differences between earlier and impugned FIRs, evidence of NCLT findings and observer reports, and petitioner's non-cooperation, the court found prima facie cognizable offences and dismissed the applications. Case-Laws Companies Law Sat, 28 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787504