<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 261 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787506</link>
    <description>Absence of a show cause notice prior to a confiscation order under the Customs Act invalidates the order as a procedural infirmity and breach of principles of natural justice; a contested waiver letter did not cure this defect and recent High Court authority treats issuance of a show cause notice as mandatory, leading to quashing of the confiscation order. Disputed factual questions on seizure legality under seizure provisions and whether detention arose from non-declaration or non-payment of duty require fresh consideration. The matter is remitted for reconsideration with directions for the petitioner to file a reply in two weeks, three personal hearings and a final speaking order within twelve weeks; seized goods to be preserved pending final orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 261 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787506</link>
      <description>Absence of a show cause notice prior to a confiscation order under the Customs Act invalidates the order as a procedural infirmity and breach of principles of natural justice; a contested waiver letter did not cure this defect and recent High Court authority treats issuance of a show cause notice as mandatory, leading to quashing of the confiscation order. Disputed factual questions on seizure legality under seizure provisions and whether detention arose from non-declaration or non-payment of duty require fresh consideration. The matter is remitted for reconsideration with directions for the petitioner to file a reply in two weeks, three personal hearings and a final speaking order within twelve weeks; seized goods to be preserved pending final orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>