<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 263 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787508</link>
    <description>Benami property includes immovable assets held by an ostensible owner where another person provides consideration and the property is held for that person&#039;s benefit. Sale proceeds derived from such property are also treated as benami property. The 2016 amended regime applies where property transferred before the amendment continues to be held by the alleged benamidar after it takes effect, subject to the statutory conditions. The fiduciary exception does not protect a person who exercises dominion over property, retains title deeds, arranges transfers, and derives personal financial benefit, as these facts are inconsistent with exclusive trust. The provisional attachment and benami finding were upheld, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 263 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787508</link>
      <description>Benami property includes immovable assets held by an ostensible owner where another person provides consideration and the property is held for that person&#039;s benefit. Sale proceeds derived from such property are also treated as benami property. The 2016 amended regime applies where property transferred before the amendment continues to be held by the alleged benamidar after it takes effect, subject to the statutory conditions. The fiduciary exception does not protect a person who exercises dominion over property, retains title deeds, arranges transfers, and derives personal financial benefit, as these facts are inconsistent with exclusive trust. The provisional attachment and benami finding were upheld, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>