<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 165 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50450</link>
    <description>Revocation of a Customs House Agent licence was considered premature where the same seizure proceedings were still pending, because the final position on the licence depended on the outcome of the seizure adjudication. Immediate enforcement of the revocation order was therefore found inappropriate at that stage, and its operation was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:54:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 165 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50450</link>
      <description>Revocation of a Customs House Agent licence was considered premature where the same seizure proceedings were still pending, because the final position on the licence depended on the outcome of the seizure adjudication. Immediate enforcement of the revocation order was therefore found inappropriate at that stage, and its operation was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>