<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 286 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787531</link>
    <description>Pre-adjudicatory GST notice affording seven working days to respond does not constitute a final determination; therefore substantive judicial review on rate applicability and calculation is premature. The appropriate course is procedural: grant additional time to preserve the petitioners&#039; right to be heard and require the administrative authority to consider the petitioner&#039;s response and decide in accordance with law. Operative effect: petitioners receive a fortnight&#039;s extension to reply, and the State GST authority must reconsider and decide the matter following due procedure rather than face interlocutory merits adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 286 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787531</link>
      <description>Pre-adjudicatory GST notice affording seven working days to respond does not constitute a final determination; therefore substantive judicial review on rate applicability and calculation is premature. The appropriate course is procedural: grant additional time to preserve the petitioners&#039; right to be heard and require the administrative authority to consider the petitioner&#039;s response and decide in accordance with law. Operative effect: petitioners receive a fortnight&#039;s extension to reply, and the State GST authority must reconsider and decide the matter following due procedure rather than face interlocutory merits adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>