<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 295 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787540</link>
    <description>Whether a show cause notice under Section 74 CGST can consolidate multiple financial years was decided by reference to the statutory design tying tax liability to defined tax periods and separate year-wise limitation regimes under Sections 73(10)/74(10). The court applied statutory interpretation and prior Division Bench precedents to hold that distinct tax periods cannot be clubbed into a single Section 74 notice; allegations of fraudulent input tax credit affect limitation but do not permit collapsing separate periods. The impugned consolidated notice and order were quashed; re-issuance limited to separate periods and statutory scope was permitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 295 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787540</link>
      <description>Whether a show cause notice under Section 74 CGST can consolidate multiple financial years was decided by reference to the statutory design tying tax liability to defined tax periods and separate year-wise limitation regimes under Sections 73(10)/74(10). The court applied statutory interpretation and prior Division Bench precedents to hold that distinct tax periods cannot be clubbed into a single Section 74 notice; allegations of fraudulent input tax credit affect limitation but do not permit collapsing separate periods. The impugned consolidated notice and order were quashed; re-issuance limited to separate periods and statutory scope was permitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>