https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97480 Omission of a statutory rule that lacks a saving clause removes the legal basis for actions taken solely under it; the impugned recovery proceedings were instituted exclusively under Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules and, following the rule's omission, the statutory foundation ceased to exist, requiring those orders to be set aside. The article explains the court's application of the principle that administrative orders cannot survive the repeal or omission of the provision authorising them in the absence of a saving clause, and records the consequent allowance of the writ petitions and dismissal of related contentions without costs. en-us Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:18 +0530 Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97480 Omission of a statutory rule that lacks a saving clause removes the legal basis for actions taken solely under it; the impugned recovery proceedings were instituted exclusively under Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules and, following the rule's omission, the statutory foundation ceased to exist, requiring those orders to be set aside. The article explains the court's application of the principle that administrative orders cannot survive the repeal or omission of the provision authorising them in the absence of a saving clause, and records the consequent allowance of the writ petitions and dismissal of related contentions without costs. Highlights GST Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:18 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97480