<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Invocation of guarantee: Section 95 petition held maintainable after valid demand; substituted service and assignment upheld, costs imposed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97457</link>
    <description>Valid invocation of a guarantee was established by a recovery certificate and subsequent demand notices, rendering a petition under Section 95 maintainable and defeating the limitation plea. Service on the personal guarantor by email, speed post, newspaper publication and electronic messaging was found effective; the guarantor was aware yet deliberately abstained, justifying ex parte admission. An assignment to an assignee during proceedings did not vitiate the petition because the assignee steps into the assignor&#039;s shoes and retains locus. Deliberate non participation and parallel remedies amounted to abuse of process, disentitling relief and attracting exemplary costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Invocation of guarantee: Section 95 petition held maintainable after valid demand; substituted service and assignment upheld, costs imposed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97457</link>
      <description>Valid invocation of a guarantee was established by a recovery certificate and subsequent demand notices, rendering a petition under Section 95 maintainable and defeating the limitation plea. Service on the personal guarantor by email, speed post, newspaper publication and electronic messaging was found effective; the guarantor was aware yet deliberately abstained, justifying ex parte admission. An assignment to an assignee during proceedings did not vitiate the petition because the assignee steps into the assignor&#039;s shoes and retains locus. Deliberate non participation and parallel remedies amounted to abuse of process, disentitling relief and attracting exemplary costs.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>