<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reason to believe test allows provisional attachment when investigation links demonetized currency conversion to gold; attachment sustained.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97455</link>
    <description>Provisional attachment under the PMLA was upheld because investigative material furnished a reason to believe that the appellant participated in converting demonetized currency into gold/bullion, establishing a proximate link between seized currency and proceeds of crime; absence of the appellant&#039;s name in the FIR/ECIR did not bar attachment since PMLA proceedings depend on independent investigative material and statements recorded during the probe; attachment may extend to equivalent value of proceeds even where property was acquired earlier, and the prima facie case met the statutory threshold for sustaining provisional attachment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reason to believe test allows provisional attachment when investigation links demonetized currency conversion to gold; attachment sustained.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97455</link>
      <description>Provisional attachment under the PMLA was upheld because investigative material furnished a reason to believe that the appellant participated in converting demonetized currency into gold/bullion, establishing a proximate link between seized currency and proceeds of crime; absence of the appellant&#039;s name in the FIR/ECIR did not bar attachment since PMLA proceedings depend on independent investigative material and statements recorded during the probe; attachment may extend to equivalent value of proceeds even where property was acquired earlier, and the prima facie case met the statutory threshold for sustaining provisional attachment.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 08:39:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>