<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1705 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467102</link>
    <description>Where possession of guarantor properties exists under the SARFAESI framework and the Adjudicating Authority determines that a combined sale of corporate-debtor and guarantor assets will maximise realisation, a joint e-auction is permissible; the article states such a refusal to stay the combined auction will not be interfered with absent demonstrated prejudice, and that statutory remedies under SARFAESI remain available to the guarantor. The dominant legal point is that a mode of sale that enhances overall realisation is lawful and will not automatically extinguish SARFAESI rights or justify injunctive relief against the e-auction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 15:05:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1705 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467102</link>
      <description>Where possession of guarantor properties exists under the SARFAESI framework and the Adjudicating Authority determines that a combined sale of corporate-debtor and guarantor assets will maximise realisation, a joint e-auction is permissible; the article states such a refusal to stay the combined auction will not be interfered with absent demonstrated prejudice, and that statutory remedies under SARFAESI remain available to the guarantor. The dominant legal point is that a mode of sale that enhances overall realisation is lawful and will not automatically extinguish SARFAESI rights or justify injunctive relief against the e-auction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>