<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1702 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467105</link>
    <description>Whether trading in a listed scrip constituted market manipulation under Section 12A(a),(b),(c) of the SEBI Act read with Regulations 3 and 4 PFUTP: the Tribunal held that continuous buying, large public shareholding acquisition and contributing to positive last traded price do not alone establish fraudulent conduct; violation requires specific evidence such as buy orders placed above prevailing LTP, collusion or a meeting of minds, which were absent. Alleged connections and asserted motive to provide exit at inflated prices were unsupported by admissible evidence. Outcome: impugned order quashed and appeals allowed for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 20:54:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=889229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1702 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467105</link>
      <description>Whether trading in a listed scrip constituted market manipulation under Section 12A(a),(b),(c) of the SEBI Act read with Regulations 3 and 4 PFUTP: the Tribunal held that continuous buying, large public shareholding acquisition and contributing to positive last traded price do not alone establish fraudulent conduct; violation requires specific evidence such as buy orders placed above prevailing LTP, collusion or a meeting of minds, which were absent. Alleged connections and asserted motive to provide exit at inflated prices were unsupported by admissible evidence. Outcome: impugned order quashed and appeals allowed for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>